In the medium term he mentions:
- Legacies of both the Global and the Eurozone crises are still visible in many countries.
To varying
degrees, high levels of debt—public, corporate, or household—still weigh
on spending and growth. Nonperforming loans, in a number of European
countries, are still weighing on banks, and limiting credit supply to
new borrowers. Low growth, in turn, makes deleveraging a slow process.
- Potential output growth has declined.
- The sharp decline in the price of oil came as a surprise.
The change in the price of oil is a macroeconomic shock (think of shifting curves in aggregate demand and IS-LM models)
- Exchange rate movements have been unusually large.
He takes all these things and says that he expects world growth to be about the same as last year.
I wonder how he views the continued decrease in oil prices affecting the longer term. It is quite a powerful industry especially in the Middle East; on the other hand the US and other countries have energy resources of their own and are continuing to develop renewable energy so in the long term the Oil industry may become obsolete altogether. Also his solution for how to resolve the hiccups in the global economy is to have country specific policies, but does there need to be any sort of global coordination to prevent future crises?
ReplyDeleteI find it surprising that Blanchard thinks the economy can be explained through only four categories. By now, I think that we have established that the economy is extremely complex and not always well understood. In my opinion the main point that Blanchard was incorrect on is the decrease of risk in the Eurozone. If anything, I think the risk has increased with Greece and its lack of reform and repayment.
ReplyDelete